Compliance with and enforcement of family law parenting orders
There is a need for empirical research to develop a greater understanding of the enforcement regime in the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) and the factors that do or do not support compliance with parenting orders. Should reform of the enforcement regime be implemented, this project would also provide baseline evidence against which the impact of any reforms could be measured.
This project will use mixed-method research aimed at examining compliance with parenting orders and the operation of the enforcement regime. To address these research aims, the proposed research is intended to generate empirical evidence to address the following key issues:
- The factors associated with non-compliance with parenting orders
- The circumstances in which the contravention regime is applied and the patterns in court outcomes when it is applied
- The extent to which penalties are effective at reducing non-compliance and whether, where there are ongoing concerns about family violence, they deter contraventions or inhibit parties in seeking court protection.
Subject to the relevant ethics and other clearances, the project will use the following methods:
1. Contravention matter court file analysis:
The collection and analysis of data from a sample of court files involving contravention applications in selected registries of the Family Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
2. Online survey of separated parents with parenting orders:
the collection and analysis of data about parents’ views and experiences through an online survey of separated parents who have obtained parentings orders (either by judicial determination or by consent) in the five years preceding the survey.
3. Online survey of professionals and interviews with judicial officers:
The collection and analysis of data from the range of family law system professionals to assess the influence of professional practices, and systemic and legislative factors that influence the operation of the enforcement regime.
4. Analysis of international approaches:
A desktop review of enforcement approaches in three international jurisdictions to consider the legislative and systemic approaches to enforcement and how professional practices do or do not support effective implementation of these approaches.
Dr Rae Kaspiew, Australian Institute of Family Studies
Dr Rachel Carson, Australian Institute of Family Studies
Dr Lixia Qu, Australian Institute of Family Studies
Ms Dinika Roopani, Australian Institute of Family Studies
Professor Helen Rhoades, Consultant
The AIFS team will engage in stakeholder consultation throughout the project and in particular, at each key phase. Stakeholders include Commonwealth and jurisdictional representation from government departments, courts and support agencies.
$977,493 (excluding GST)